Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 3:51 pm
Not sure about the yacht - we've seen from recent events that loose talk happens on yachts and leads to all sorts of trouble (then I'm out of touch - I thought yachts were things with sails on, not things with casinos on)...
...but seriously...
It's probably worth mentioning here that this subject has "form". Back when CH first approached us about links with the club, we (ie mainly the committee) went through a process of discussion which lasted, oooooh, it felt like forever, trying to work out what the club was about and what we'd want if we could have it. Various issues complicated and lengthened this discussion but central among them were those of fairness; the notion that any benefit should be for all rather than the few. As a result lines were struck through many ideas simply because they targeted specific groups or types of members or those with specific interests. I think the same issues are involved here - call it politics if you will - and I think there's a danger in this that it prevents agreement on absolutely everything.
Personally (ie not taking any committee line here) I have a few thoughts...:-
* I think it's okay to point more resources at specific groups if there's a good enough reason. For example, young riders. Thinking to the future, the long-term success of the club will depend on getting young people involved. We're still a pretty unfashionable sport (especially the on-road end of it), so we need to work harder to get teenagers on board. Plus, when you're young, money is probably going to be tighter (not always the case I know, but in general).
* I think buying use of facilities/skills/training etc is more useful than buying stuff. Stuff is always problematic - storage, logging in/out, maintenance, insurance etc - and I speak as someone who's got a pile of event-related stuff in our workshop.
* Membership-wise we're knocking on 150 at present and at current rate of growth will clear 200 next year. We're a big club now, and the majority of the membership is pretty active. I think we should be focusing less on expanding membership and more on increasing skills at all levels. This could include skills in competition, skills in coaching, skills in leading/organising/coordinating (in the latter case not because current ride leaders lack skills, but to broaden the base; to give a bigger pool).
* I think we've got all sorts of opportunities to tie in with York St.Johns if we worked on it and if someone was prepared to take a lead in it (I wouldn't even mind doing this myself, but someone else'd have to take on the membership sec job...). A regular winter programme of talks, sharing of info, indoor training, assessment and coaching, sports science, etc..? Stuff you could stick in your diary well in advance and facilities you could rely on getting use of?
Lastly, as you're all aware the successful Cycling Demonstration Town bid means that York has squillions to spend on getting more people cycling. Alongside all the more obvious and direct stuff, I think cycling as a sport has a role to play - it sets challenges, it adds glamour and excitement and gives role models. I think Clifton should be elbowing in on some of the CDT stuff and seeing how we could both benefit and contribute. Which brings with it the consideration that it's not just Clifton's millions we could be thinking about - there could be lots more money out there we could be putting to good use so that we enable good new stuff to happen (while still keeping our millions in the bank for whatever rainy days might be around the corner). Beijing success, 2012 Olympics, CDT money, big club growth... ...these are the good times, let's make the most of them while still remembering there may be less good ones sometime ahead.
...but seriously...
It's probably worth mentioning here that this subject has "form". Back when CH first approached us about links with the club, we (ie mainly the committee) went through a process of discussion which lasted, oooooh, it felt like forever, trying to work out what the club was about and what we'd want if we could have it. Various issues complicated and lengthened this discussion but central among them were those of fairness; the notion that any benefit should be for all rather than the few. As a result lines were struck through many ideas simply because they targeted specific groups or types of members or those with specific interests. I think the same issues are involved here - call it politics if you will - and I think there's a danger in this that it prevents agreement on absolutely everything.
Personally (ie not taking any committee line here) I have a few thoughts...:-
* I think it's okay to point more resources at specific groups if there's a good enough reason. For example, young riders. Thinking to the future, the long-term success of the club will depend on getting young people involved. We're still a pretty unfashionable sport (especially the on-road end of it), so we need to work harder to get teenagers on board. Plus, when you're young, money is probably going to be tighter (not always the case I know, but in general).
* I think buying use of facilities/skills/training etc is more useful than buying stuff. Stuff is always problematic - storage, logging in/out, maintenance, insurance etc - and I speak as someone who's got a pile of event-related stuff in our workshop.
* Membership-wise we're knocking on 150 at present and at current rate of growth will clear 200 next year. We're a big club now, and the majority of the membership is pretty active. I think we should be focusing less on expanding membership and more on increasing skills at all levels. This could include skills in competition, skills in coaching, skills in leading/organising/coordinating (in the latter case not because current ride leaders lack skills, but to broaden the base; to give a bigger pool).
* I think we've got all sorts of opportunities to tie in with York St.Johns if we worked on it and if someone was prepared to take a lead in it (I wouldn't even mind doing this myself, but someone else'd have to take on the membership sec job...). A regular winter programme of talks, sharing of info, indoor training, assessment and coaching, sports science, etc..? Stuff you could stick in your diary well in advance and facilities you could rely on getting use of?
Lastly, as you're all aware the successful Cycling Demonstration Town bid means that York has squillions to spend on getting more people cycling. Alongside all the more obvious and direct stuff, I think cycling as a sport has a role to play - it sets challenges, it adds glamour and excitement and gives role models. I think Clifton should be elbowing in on some of the CDT stuff and seeing how we could both benefit and contribute. Which brings with it the consideration that it's not just Clifton's millions we could be thinking about - there could be lots more money out there we could be putting to good use so that we enable good new stuff to happen (while still keeping our millions in the bank for whatever rainy days might be around the corner). Beijing success, 2012 Olympics, CDT money, big club growth... ...these are the good times, let's make the most of them while still remembering there may be less good ones sometime ahead.